Confucius, he say…

“May you live in interesting times” is reputedly the English version or paraphrase of an ancient Chinese curse.

Whatever its origin, the saying crops up in a variety of differing situations including a speech by Robert F Kennedy in 1966, a letter from Austen Chamberlain to a member of the US House of Representatives and more recently in a speech by Bob Garvin, the character played by Donald Sutherland in the 1994 film, Disclosure.

The film starred Demi Moore and Michael Douglas who, contrary to what you might expect from the title, were not engaged in a Hollywood version of Part 31 but played a couple who worked in a technology company and who became engrossed in a sexual harassment case!!

Continue reading

Jackson Road Show

I travelled to Birmingham recently to attend one of the road shows hosted by Lord Justice Jackson as part of the consultation exercise following publication of his preliminary report. That exercise is now complete and we await his final report at the end of the year. The event was well attended, attracting about 150 lawyers, civil servants, trade unions and other professionals, with a keynote address by the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge. Rupert Jackson’s two assessors, Mike Napier of Irwin Mitchell and Jeremy Morgan also attended.

Speakers included Professor Helen Genn, Anthony Hughes of FOIL, Amanda Stevens (Charles Russell and formerly of APIL), John Ussher of UNITE and Judge Stephen Oliver-Jones QC.

The message which came across loud and clear was that change is on its way and particularly in relation to areas of litigation practice such as disclosure. If lawyers cannot come up with a more efficient and cost effective way of dealing with disclosure, the rules relating to disclosure will have to be changed to make the process less onerous and therefore cheaper to comply with.

All this is of a piece with Mrs Justice Gloster’s view expressed at a recent Commercial Litigators’ Forum meeting that the days of courts filled with lever arch files are over.

You say discovery, I say disclosure…

I must admit I have always been baffled by the decision taken by Lord Woolf in Access to Justice to rebrand the process of “Discovery”, which we all knew and loved and to call it “Disclosure”.

I don’t think you see the process called Disclosure elsewhere in the world and indeed, I have recently had reason to look at the new Irish Supreme Court rules for 2009 and see that they resolutely refuse to follow Lord Woolf’s lead and firmly call the process Discovery. 

I am not sure what lies behind the change but the process described is still the most expensive and time consuming of all the litigation tasks.

Coupled with the reluctance to come to terms with new technologies and the increasing amount of documents for disclosure caused by emails, back up tapes etc., disclosure has become a nightmare for clients and lawyers alike.

I hope that some sensible recommendations for change will come out of the Jackson review on costs.   However, a start could be made now if..

Continue reading